|
This hierarchy can be demonstrated by working backwards. First
combine the two equilibrium equations to eliminate V:
Next replace the moment resultant M with its definition in
terms of the direct stress s:
Use the constitutive relation to eliminate s in favor of the strain e, and then use kinematics to replace e in favor of the normal displacement w:
As a final step, recognizing that the integral over
y2 is the definition of the beam's area moment of
inertia I,
We arrive at the beam-column equation based on the
Euler-Bernoulli beam theory,
Since columns are usually used as compression members, engineers
may be more familiar with the axial compression resultant
f than the tensile resultant N. Let f =
-N. The beam-column equation expressed with f is
therefore,
|